Activities
Consumer Relevant Risk Communication: Recommendations to Facilitate Informed Decision-Making by Consumers regarding acceptance of emerging food technologies
Building on the conclusions of the previous expert group on risk and benefit perception of new technologies, the task force decided to undertake a new activity on risk communication. This review will provide a systematic analysis of risk communication in the area of food technology. An important outcome will be the development of concrete and actionable recommendations for a risk communication strategy focused on consumer priorities as well as technical information about risk assessment.
The expert group will organise a roundtable with various experts to discuss the scientific content of the paper before submitting it to a peer-reviewed journal.
Workshop
The task force is also planning to make the results of the activity available to a wider audience, and get input from a variety of stakeholders. The task force will therefore organise a workshop, inviting academic experts, scientists from industry, as well as stakeholders who are in charge of informing consumers. The outcome of the workshop will be published in a summary report and will be widely distributed.
This activity will allow risk experts and others who communicate about new food technologies to take into account consumers’ risk perceptions (which include benefit perception, ethical concerns and other factors usually not considered by risk experts) when they are setting up risk communication strategies. This will in turn facilitate consumer informed decision-making with regards to acceptance or rejection of emerging food technologies.
Consumer Response to Novel Agri-Food Technologies: Implications for predicting consumer acceptance of emerging food technologies
Public acceptance of technology is not something that can be taken for granted. This expert group will illustrate how this is particularly true for the agro-food sector. The paper will first review various case studies and will then derive some theoretical frameworks. The technologies that have been identified for the case studies include:
- Nutrigenomics
- Genetically Modified Foods
- Nanotechnologies
- Animal cloning
- Irradiation
- Technologies that are generally accepted
The aim of the paper is to:
- Create a framework describing the way in which consumers form their opinion and choice behaviour towards new food technology.
The paper has been published in Trends in Food Science and Technology.
Food Choice, Energy Balance and its Determinants
Both physical activity and food intake have been the object of large bodies of research. In particular, the literature on determinants of food choice and dietary intake is broad and creates the impression that every conceivable factor in some way or another has an impact on how, when, and what we eat. This makes the analysis of the causes of obesity a complex issue. When human beings make consistent changes in their patterns of behaviour over time, we tend to assume that they adapt to changes in their environment. But which of the many changes in the environment do they react to, and how?
The expert group provides economic and psychological approaches to explain how human beings adapt their food intake and their level of physical activity to changes in the environment. Economic approaches, trying to explain behaviour leading to weight gain and obesity are contrasted with psychological approaches.
The paper gives some insight into the various mechanisms of adaptive behaviour determining food intake and physical activity, and suggests that a broad view is necessary for understanding the ways in which commonly advocated policy instruments can affect energy-related behaviour.
The paper will soon be re-submitted to a peer-reviewed scientific journal.
Task Force Collaborators
2012 Members
Dr. Carel Vereijken - Chair - |
Danone |
DE |
| |
|
|
| Ms. Isil Cakmak |
Ülker Bisküvi |
TR |
Mr. Edouard Casala |
Bunge Europe |
BE |
Dr. Karen Cunningham |
Coca-Cola Europe |
UK |
Dr. Marco Franci |
Soremartec Italia - Ferrero Group |
IT |
Dr. Johanna Kuenzel |
Nestlé |
CH |
Dr. René Lion |
Unilever |
NL |
Dr. Gary Mendelson |
Solae Europe |
RU |
Dr. Michel Rogeaux |
Danone |
FR |
Dr. Josephine Wills |
EUFIC |
BE |
| |
|
|
Ms. Fabienne Malherbe |
ILSI Europe |
BE |
Ms. Ria Dewit |
ILSI Europe |
BE |
Expert Group Risk CommunicationProf. Lynn Frewer - Chair- |
University of Newcastle |
UK |
| |
|
|
Ms. Mary Brennan |
University of Newcastle |
UK |
Dr. Arnout Fischer |
Wageningen University |
NL |
Dr. René Lion |
Unilever |
NL |
Dr. Ree Meertens |
University Maastricht |
NL |
Dr. Gene Rowe |
Consultant |
UK |
Prof. Michael Siegrist |
ETH Zürich |
CH |
Prof. Wim Verbeke |
University of Ghent |
BE |
Dr. Carel Vereijken |
Danone |
NL |
| |
|
|
Ms. Fabienne Malherbe |
ILSI Europe |
BE |
Expert Group Consumer Response to Novel Agri-Food Technologies Prof. Lynn Frewer - Chair- |
University of Newcastle |
UK |
| |
|
|
| Dr. Karin Bergmann |
Consultant |
DE |
Ms. Mary Brennan |
University of Newcastle |
UK |
Dr. Ree Meertens |
University Maastricht |
NL |
Dr. Gene Rowe |
Consultant |
UK |
Prof. Michael Siegrist |
ETH Zürich |
CH |
Prof. Wim Verbeke |
University of Ghent |
BE |
Dr. Carel Vereijken |
Danone |
NL |
| |
|
|
Ms. Fabienne Malherbe |
ILSI Europe |
BE |
Expert Group Food Choice, Energy Balance and its Determinants
Prof. Klaus Grunert - Chair- |
|
DK |
| |
|
|
| Dr. Erin Alexander |
Nestlé Research Center |
CH |
|
|
UK |
|
Consultant |
US |
|
|
UK |
|
|
UK |
|
|
NO |
| |
|
|
Ms. Fabienne Malherbe |
ILSI Europe |
BE |
Publication
P. Leathwood, D. Richardson, P. Sträter, P. Todd and H. van Trijp. Consumer Understanding of Nutrition and Health Claims: Sources of Evidence. British Journal of Nutrition 2007;98(3):474-484.
For more information, please contact info@ilsieurope.be.