Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

Consumer Science Task Force

Background

Food choice and dietary behaviour are among the most important lifestyle factors determining human health and well-being. It is therefore of utmost importance to both the food industry and public policymakers but also to consumer representatives to better understand the reasons behind consumers’ food choices.

Objectives

The Consumer Science Task Force aims to provide a better understanding of consumers’ food perceptions and behaviours in order to support consumers in making well-informed and healthier food choices.

Impact

The task force will help understand how consumers react towards new food technologies, how they assess risks and benefits and how they make choices. Understanding their behaviour will help identify the most suitable information to avoid that consumer perceptions are not based on actual facts. Consequently, industry, policy makers and regulatory agencies will be able to engage more meaningfully with the public to inform them and support them in making appropriate decisions.
 
 

Activities

Consumer Relevant Risk Communication: Recommendations to Facilitate Informed Decision-Making by Consumers regarding acceptance of emerging food technologies

Building on the conclusions of the previous expert group on risk and benefit perception of new technologies, the task force decided to undertake a new activity on risk communication. This review will provide a systematic analysis of risk communication in the area of food technology. An important outcome will be the development of concrete and actionable recommendations for a risk communication strategy focused on consumer priorities as well as technical information about risk assessment.

The expert group will organise a roundtable with various experts to discuss the scientific content of the paper before submitting it to a peer-reviewed journal.

Workshop

The task force is also planning to make the results of the activity available to a wider audience, and get input from a variety of stakeholders. The task force will therefore organise a workshop, inviting academic experts, scientists from industry, as well as stakeholders who are in charge of informing consumers. The outcome of the workshop will be published in a summary report and will be widely distributed.

This activity will allow risk experts and others who communicate about new food technologies to take into account consumers’ risk perceptions (which include benefit perception, ethical concerns and other factors usually not considered by risk experts) when they are setting up risk communication strategies. This will in turn facilitate consumer informed decision-making with regards to acceptance or rejection of emerging food technologies. 

Consumer Response to Novel Agri-Food Technologies: Implications for predicting consumer acceptance of emerging food technologies

Public acceptance of technology is not something that can be taken for granted. This expert group will illustrate how this is particularly true for the agro-food sector. The paper will first review various case studies and will then derive some theoretical frameworks. The technologies that have been identified for the case studies include:

  • Nutrigenomics
  • Genetically Modified Foods
  • Nanotechnologies
  • Animal cloning
  • Irradiation
  • Technologies that are generally accepted

The aim of the paper is to:

  • Create a framework describing the way in which consumers form their opinion and choice behaviour towards new food technology.

The paper has been published in Trends in Food Science and Technology.

Food Choice, Energy Balance and its Determinants

Both physical activity and food intake have been the object of large bodies of research. In particular, the literature on determinants of food choice and dietary intake is broad and creates the impression that every conceivable factor in some way or another has an impact on how, when, and what we eat. This makes the analysis of the causes of obesity a complex issue. When human beings make consistent changes in their patterns of behaviour over time, we tend to assume that they adapt to changes in their environment. But which of the many changes in the environment do they react to, and how?

The expert group provides economic and psychological approaches to explain how human beings adapt their food intake and their level of physical activity to changes in the environment. Economic approaches, trying to explain behaviour leading to weight gain and obesity are contrasted with psychological approaches.

The paper gives some insight into the various mechanisms of adaptive behaviour determining food intake and physical activity, and suggests that a broad view is necessary for understanding the ways in which commonly advocated policy instruments can affect energy-related behaviour.

The paper will soon be re-submitted to a peer-reviewed scientific journal.
 

Task Force Collaborators

2012 Members

Dr. Carel Vereijken - Chair -
Danone
DE
​Ms. Isil Cakmak Ülker Bisküvi​ ​TR
Mr. Edouard Casala
Bunge Europe
BE
Dr. Karen Cunningham
Coca-Cola Europe
UK
Dr. Marco Franci
Soremartec Italia - Ferrero Group
IT
Dr. Johanna Kuenzel
Nestlé
CH
Dr. René Lion
Unilever
NL
Dr. Gary Mendelson
Solae Europe
RU
Dr. Michel Rogeaux
Danone
FR
Dr. Josephine Wills
EUFIC
BE
Ms. Fabienne Malherbe
ILSI Europe
BE
Ms. Ria Dewit
ILSI Europe
BE

 

Expert Group Risk Communication

Prof. Lynn Frewer - Chair-
University of Newcastle
UK
Ms. Mary Brennan
University of Newcastle
UK
Dr. Arnout Fischer
Wageningen University
NL
Dr. René Lion
Unilever
NL
Dr. Ree Meertens
University Maastricht
NL
Dr. Gene Rowe
Consultant
UK
Prof. Michael Siegrist
ETH Zürich
CH
Prof. Wim Verbeke
University of Ghent
BE
Dr. Carel Vereijken
Danone
NL
Ms. Fabienne Malherbe
ILSI Europe
BE

 

 

 

Expert Group Consumer Response to Novel Agri-Food Technologies 

Prof. Lynn Frewer - Chair-
University of Newcastle
UK
​Dr. Karin Bergmann ​Consultant ​DE
Ms. Mary Brennan
University of Newcastle
UK
Dr. Ree Meertens
University Maastricht
NL
Dr. Gene Rowe
Consultant
UK
Prof. Michael Siegrist
ETH Zürich
CH
Prof. Wim Verbeke
University of Ghent
BE
Dr. Carel Vereijken
Danone
NL
Ms. Fabienne Malherbe
ILSI Europe
BE

 

Expert Group Food Choice, Energy Balance and its Determinants

Prof. Klaus Grunert - Chair-
University of Aarhus
DK
​Dr. Erin Alexander
Nestlé Research Center
​CH
Dr. Karen Cunningham
Coca-Cola Europe
UK
Dr. Gerd Harzer
Consultant
US 
Prof. Richard Shepherd
University of Surrey
UK
Dr. Bruce Traill
University of Reading
UK 
Prof. Bente Wold
University of Bergen
NO 
Ms. Fabienne Malherbe
ILSI Europe
BE

 

Publication

 

P. Leathwood, D. Richardson, P. Sträter, P. Todd and H. van Trijp. Consumer Understanding of Nutrition and Health Claims: Sources of Evidence. British Journal of Nutrition 2007;98(3):474-484.

For more information, please contact info@ilsieurope.be.

 

 

 

 

Consumer Science Task Force